Here are some photos we took of second year International Relations students at the annual Model UN Assembly, which was held at Lincolnshire County Council.
Lincoln Law School’s Professor Matthew Hall has released a book titled ‘Victims of Crime: Construction, Governance and Policy (Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology), which is available in hardback and as a Kindle download https://www.amazon.co.uk
This book critically engages with the development of official policy and reform in relation to the support of victims of crime both within and beyond the criminal justice system of England and Wales. Since the election of the Conservative/Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in May 2010 it is argued that victimization has increasingly taken on a greater cultural resonance both in England and Wales and in other industrialised countries. Images of terrorism, public debates around the handling of sexual victimisation by the courts, and the issue of child sexual exploitation have catapulted victim issues into the public consciousness like never before – generating a new form of what Hall terms ‘victim capital’. As such, this book utilises a combination of cultural victimological analysis, governance theory and legal scholarship to address fundamental questions concerning the drivers and impact of victim policy in England and Wales in the 21st century. An engaging and original study, this book will be of particular interest to scholars of victimology and the criminal justice system, as well as activists and policy makers.
If you have something you would like us to post here, please email: email@example.com
Access, participation and success in higher education are rarely considered as priorities when contemplating ways to support forced migrants that is refugees, asylum seekers and others in need of international protection. Yet, education, including higher education, is critical to supporting forced migrants establish themselves in a new country.
Education creates life-enhancing opportunities, and helps forced migrants to shape their own futures and gain a sense of belonging in their new community. However, many forced migrants living in the UK are unable to avail themselves of such opportunities due to limitations placed upon them, such as their international student status or their ineligibility for vital student finance.
Many universities in the UK are working hard to facilitate the entry of forced migrants into highereducation, by offering scholarships and other types of support. The Article 26 project was founded in 2010 and supports universities in developing and implementing scholarships, and sanctuary scholars themselves, with the aim of maximising their participation and success in higher education. We are beginning the new year with the launch of a set of guiding principles that assist universities and other higher education institutions in enabling, encouraging and supporting the participation of forced migrant students in higher education.
Introducing the Guiding Principles on Sanctuary Scholars in UK Higher Education
The Guiding Principles provide the foundations for any sanctuary initiative designed to support the success of forced migrants in higher education. They are a vital strategic planning tool for institutions, tailored to assist them in establishing, sustaining or growing their scholarships and wider initiatives that support forced migrants at their institutions.
There are 10 main principles. These are:
- The right of forced migrants to access higher education – as is evidenced in international, European and domestic law.
- Equal treatment and non-discrimination – the primary identity of Sanctuary Scholars should be that of a student, and not their immigration status.
- The right to privacy – protecting the privacy of Sanctuary Scholars and preventing the unlawful disclosure of their immigration status, especially without their permission.
- An outline of Sanctuary Initiatives – Sanctuary Initiatives can vary in design and scale, but they need to be tailored to meet the needs of forced migrant students.
- Underlying principles for the design and implementation of Sanctuary Initiatives – Sanctuary Initiatives should be accessible, fair, inclusive and transparent, and give due consideration to the needs and academic interests of Sanctuary Scholars.
- Selection processes and removal of procedural barriers – processes need to be transparent, fair and accommodating.
- Communication – clear, effective and timely communication is key.
- Academic, pastoral and professional support – it is vital that Sanctuary Scholars have access to support services that effectively consider their specific needs as forced migrants.
- Student progress and participation – keeping track of academic and social engagement is important for maximising student success.
- Staff training – championing knowledge and awareness of the specific needs of Sanctuary Scholars among key staff.
The Guiding Principles are authored by Ben Hudson – Lecturer in Law at the University of Lincoln, and Rebecca Murray – Director of the Article 26 project. Their formulation has benefitted greatly from insights provided by expert gatherings of university representatives, students, academics and practitioners. Their development has come in response to the need for overarching guidance that supports the design and administration of clear, coherent, accessible and transparent educational initiatives targeted towards championing forced migrant students in higher education.
Sanctuary Scholars: Compendium of Resources
The ‘Guiding Principles’ are the first in a series of six resources aimed at providing the most up to date information:
- ‘Identifying Sanctuary Scholars’ – a guide to identifying the different groups (collectively described as forced migrants) that we encourage universities to include in their eligibility criteria for scholarship schemes.
- ‘Reaching out to Sanctuary Scholars’ – an outline of key outreach strategies for the promotion of sanctuary scholarships within universities, in the locality and via national platforms.
- ‘Who Needs to Comply?’ Sanctuary Scholars and Compliance – produced in partnership with Coram Children’s Legal Centre, this provides a framework to assist compliance teams to monitor forced migrant students studying within their institution.
- ‘Sanctuary Scholarship Standard Application form’ – a revised and updated application form and accompanying guidance notes to support universities in the establishment or review of their existing scholarship scheme.
- ‘Selecting Sanctuary Scholars’ – a selection framework built on and directly connected to the revised application form, which will support universities in the process of shortlisting, interviewing and assessing the specific needs of prospective forced migrant students.
In February 2017, universities and students from across the UK participated in a seminar to explore how policy and process in respect to scholarships for forced migrant students could be improved. A working group (comprised of university representatives, Article 26 student and ‘Let us Learn’ campaign representatives) was convened to take forward the production of this series of resources. The Guiding Principles underpin this catalogue of resources and will help form the basis of discussions to establish scholarships schemes, or revise and grow existing initiatives.
Achievements we’re proud of to date
Central to project’s work is the coordination of a higher education network, which offers support and guidance of what to include in a scholarship. They typically includes a full tuition-fee waiver and funding to help meet the additional costs of studying. The model of support designed by project was pioneered over a four-year period (2010 – 2014).
The project curates a comprehensive list of bursaries available across the UK that support forced migrants to qualify for university. For example, secure English language or intersessional qualifications, and opportunities to study at undergraduate and postgraduate level.
The production of a library of resources has been one of the project’s top priorities. In 2014 the project published ‘Education for All’; a comprehensive guide to supporting forced migrant students in higher education, from recruitment to graduation.
The eighth annual Article 26 conference will be hosted by Kings College London on the 28 – 30 August 2018. The conference is a three-day event: the first day is aimed at sanctuary scholars; the second day brings together sanctuary scholars, university practitioners and additional project stakeholders; the final day is an academic symposium on forced migration and higher education.
If you have something you would like us to post here, please email: firstname.lastname@example.org
A University of Lincoln graduate has established a successful counselling service in Lincolnshire supporting local children, young people and families. Alex Parkin, from Lincoln, graduated with a BSc (Hons) in Health and Social Care from the University in May 2017 shortly after co-founding the successful NW Counselling Hub CIC. Having worked in various care and supporting roles for most of her adult life, Alex felt that there was a gap in the provision and support available. With some communities in Lincolnshire finding it difficult to access mental health support, and counselling services, Alex and co-founder Naomi Watkins recognised the need to make counselling services more accessible in the county. The counselling hub now has a team of eighteen trained counsellors, offering mental health support for local communities as well as training opportunities for those looking to pursue a career in counselling. The hub provides a range of supportive therapies to suit age, need and demand and has been specially designed to create an environment where people feel comfortable and safe to talk. The team also has two therapy dogs.
Alex said: “People can sometimes be waiting months for the counselling support they need in the here and now. By creating the hub ourselves, we have been able to tailor a service for the wider community. Since opening in April 2017, we have been able to help more than 180 people. We believe this is down to the family-friendly feel, our open-minded staff and the lack of waiting lists along with the funding support we can provide.
She said her time at the University of Lincoln studying Health and Social Care had enabled her to develop her ideas.
“The course wasn’t just focused on one way of thinking or one specific idea,” she said. “In addition to the underpinning laws, policies and guidance, the course offered varied modules, viewpoints and learning materials which have enabled me to take a holistic approach to my job now. “I believe being self-employed and running a company has allowed me to use the knowledge even more as I have been able to use the teaching materials and also my tutor’s experiences and knowledge to ensure I shape the business in a way that works for the service user and empowers them. I couldn’t be where I am now without the tutors on the Health and Social Care team.”
Julie Burton, Programme Leader in the College of Social Science at the University of Lincoln said: “Alex is quite simply inspirational. She has taken every opportunity offered while at University and used it to its full advantage.
“Alex actually met her co-director when attending a Domestic Abuse conference organised by the students which led to work-based practice. Alex was also a student rep and we have seen her confidence grow so much during her time studying Health and Social Care.”
If you have something you would like us to post here, please email: email@example.com
School of Social & Political Sciences Principal Lecturer, Mr Liam McCann has kindly written a brilliant piece for us about Martin Luther King Day and its ongoing importance.
‘The ongoing importance of Martin Luther King Day, our human rights and civil liberties brings together many of the concepts developed in my recent research. As a critical criminologist, the intended pejorative description of criminology as a pilfering discipline, which allegedly fails to respect the academic boundaries of more ‘traditional’ subjects, does not offend me. On the contrary that self-determination to breach academic barriers excites me, as my most recent contributions on Authoritarian Populism, Censorship, Hegemony, Multiculturalism, National Identity and Rendition in Morley, S. et al eds. (2017) A Companion to State Power, Rights and Liberties, Bristol: Policy Press exhibits some of the breadth of my research interests. These specific areas, as my eight earlier contributions to this companion series, are pertinent to the continued relevance of Martin Luther King Day, not just to the USA, but the wider world and certainly Brexit ‘bound’ GB.
The overtly racist USA of the 1960s flaunted authoritarian populism, as white mobs aligned themselves with policing policies and practices which repressed so many others in the Black, LGBT and working class communities of an unambiguously multicultural society, but in denial of that fact. The dominant hegemonic political culture therein sought to resist progressive social and political reforms, and censor and repress their opponents. But with the overtly liberal and Christian Dr Martin Luther King, they struggled to caricature him as a subversive threat. King’s ‘simple’ dream of a world wherein everyone was treated with respect and dignity, and not judged by the colour of their skin, had and has a simple rationale firmly located in classical principles of equality before the law.
But that dream has yet to be achieved, as racism has been reinvigorate by the repugnant caricaturing of purportedly alien cultures, and the alleged threat these pose to a fictional and romanticised ‘western’ culture. The presumption of modernity as an incontestable facilitator of intellectual, political and social progress, is clearly called into question by the contemporary and their regressive attacks on hard-won rights and freedoms. The attempt to reshape American national identity was exemplified in the Black Power salutes at the 1968 Olympics and is echoed contemporarily in the Black Lives Matter kneeling during the American National Anthem. That has led to the predictable attempts to censor and marginalise those Black Americans, whose constrained gestures of protest, is portrayed as an unjust offence and anti-American. Yet at the same time black deaths are too often normalised as the inevitability of being black and therefore allegedly potentially suspect of anything and/or everything.
Martin Luther King was an exemplar of the power of the weak to resist and seek justice. Bernadette Devlin said of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Movement’s resistance to sectarian discrimination: “If the Black people of America could take on that great state, we could take on this tuppenny-ha’pennyone!”
That Civil Rights inspiration has inspired many of the most socially marginalised and criminalised to challenge their repression and resist their labels as ‘deviants’ and demand respect and social justice. Research may not provide the ‘answer’ but it should always seek to stimulate the necessary reflection upon who and what we are, what we want to achieve and why. Reflecting upon what Martin Luther King achieved invites that necessary and rewarding thoughtfulness.’
Congratulations to Lincoln Law School Senior Lecturer Diane Ryland who has been selected as EU Animal Welfare Professional of the Year 2018!
Based on the results of a voting process, Diane was selected in the Innovation and Excellence in Agriculture category of CorporateLiveWire’s annual awards. During the awards process over 100,000 businesses and corporate professionals, the general public and the international base of subscribers were invited to nominate associations, companies & individuals based on their achievements and strengths. Additionally Corporate Livewire’s extensive research team put forward a selection of individuals considered to have excelled within their industry.
Diane, a nominee subsequently shortlisted, was invited to submit details of her research on Animal Welfare Governance in Agriculture, accessible via the following links: https://staff.lincoln.ac.uk/4628ec6d-cffc-4ef3-b076-14a3ef6df8f7 and, in relation to her PhD (PT) thesis in progress http://www.law.leeds.ac.uk/people/research-students/diane-ryland – together with any notable achievements in the last 12 months. Relevant here was Diane’s participation in Working Group 16 which negotiated the ISO Technical Specification on animal welfare management related to the food supply chain, prior to its adoption by ISO Technical Committee 34 Food Products comprised of 78 Member Countries world wide. ISO Press Release: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref2147
Diane’s long-term strategy is to facilitate raised standards of farm animal welfare in agriculture and to engender increased demand for added-value agri-produce in a global agri-food supply chain, through a proposed framework of soft law tools of governance and market instruments.
An independent judging panel decided upon the most deserving teams, practices and individuals to walk away with one of their prestigious accolades. Award winners gain a place in both digital and printed versions of the published awards winners’ guide (end of March – beginning of April 2018), which will be distributed to over 90,000 businesses and professionals, as well as being distributed in Aspire Airport Lounges around the world.
Congratulations again Diane!
See more of Diane’s research into the need for improvements to the welfare of farmed animals here
Research undertaken by Diane Ryland, Senior Lecturer in the Law School at the University of Lincoln, is concerned with transnational animal welfare governance in agriculture with the objective of realising in effect the fact that animals are sentient beings able to feel pain and pleasure and experience comfort and distress. Increasingly, farmed animals are recognised as sentient beings with specific welfare needs, if not rights, deserving of respect and improved protection, but the extent to which animal sentience is translated into legally binding standards adequately to ensure the welfare of animals reared in lawful intensive farming practices is questioned.
Diane’s research looks at the global governance of the welfare of food producing animals. It examines the regional / transnational farm animal welfare standards of the European Union and the welfare standards emanating from the international animal welfare standard-setter, the World Organisation for Animal Health in its Terrestrial Animal Health Code concerned with the production systems for certain species of farm animal. Animal Welfare in agriculture is a complex issue in which diverse factors coincide and diverge, for example: science, values, cultures and religion, demographics, economics, politics and trade etc.
Private individual and collective farm assurance schemes have arisen alongside these public standards, with global retail chains sourcing agricultural produce to market in an extended agri-food supply chain. The potential for private standards to go beyond and fill lacunae in the public standards presents an opportunity to raise standards of farm animal welfare and bolster demand for enhanced animal welfare agricultural produce in a global value chain.
The relationship between public and private animal welfare standards is integral to Diane’s research. This interest led to her participation in Working Group 16 meetings held at the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, in which International Standardization Organization (ISO) Technical Specification 34700 on animal welfare management related to the food supply chain was the subject of negotiation prior to its adoption by ISO Technical Committee 34 Food Products on 1 December 2016 [General requirements and guidance for organizations in the food supply chain, 01-12-2016 [ISO/TS 34700:2016(E)]].
Diane’s research explores the implications of standardisation and proposes a framework of soft law tools of governance facilitative of raised standards of farm animal welfare, together with suggested market instruments, for example an enhanced animal welfare label, to engender increased demand for added-value agri-produce. She is researching for a PhD (Part Time) in Hybrid Animal Welfare Governance in Agriculture in the Law School at the University of Leeds, supervised by Professor Michael Cardwell, Professor of Agricultural Law.
This research, furthermore, has prompted both a nomination and shortlisting for an innovation in agriculture award, pursuant to which the education and awareness of the welfare needs of animals during their lives and the potential prospects of alleviating animal suffering through the recommendations advanced may reach a wider audience.
To commemorate the centenary of the October Revolution, the School of Social and Political Sciences was pleased to invite Chris Marsden, the National Secretary of the Socialist Equality Party (SEP), to introduce a film screening of Tsar to Lenin, a 1937 documentary record of the Revolution directed by Herman Axelbank. The film features original footage from over 100 different sources, arranged chronologically with narration by Max Eastman. 88 students attended the screening, which was followed by a lively 70-minute question and answer session.
Opinions about the Revolution and its legacy were strongly divided, and students are to be commended for their first-rate contributions. Important issues were discussed, such as historical truth, censorship, and the politics of memory. Critical questions were asked concerning the correct interpretation of 1917, the differences between the First, Second, and Third Internationals, and the fault lines between communism and fascism. Also discussed were the role of nationalism and war in sustaining capitalist social relations, the role of fourteen imperialist armies in undermining the new workers’ state, and the antagonistic relationship between Trotskyism and Stalinism.
The latter stages of the discussion addressed the contemporary relevance of Tsar to Lenin. The end of the Cold War did not mark “the End of History” (Fukuyama) or the end of the “short twentieth century” (Hobsbawm), Mr. Marsden argued. On the contrary, the intervening years have seen historically unprecedented levels of social inequality worldwide, never-ending wars by the leading capitalist powers, and the utter failure of mainstream politics – on both the right and the left – to do anything about these fundamental issues. Tsar to Lenin, it was argued, shows that an alternative – i.e. a state run by and for the working class – is possible, but only with the requisite revolutionary leadership and only from the perspective of proletarian internationalism.
All in all, this was an extremely high-quality session that would have continued beyond its allotted two and a half hours had time not run out. Twelve students (one in seven) came to shake Mr. Marsden’s hand and to thank him in person after the session, suggesting that Marxist ideas alleged to be discredited after 1989 are once again finding resonance within the student community.
Original post by Dr David Hughes
Dr Joss Winn has recently written an opinion piece for the Times Higher Education website, reporting on the recent conference, Making the Co-operative University. In part, the conference builds on research that Joss and Prof. Mike Neary have been undertaking into co-operative higher education since 2010.
“Last week, the Co-operative College, established in Manchester in 1919, hosted a conference on ‘Making the Co-operative University’ with the intention of exploring its role in supporting and co-ordinating a federated model of co-operative higher education.
Throughout the day, there was a sense of anticipation and historic responsibility among the 90 delegates who were told that in 1909, W. R. Rae, Chair of the Co-operative Union educational committee, had addressed the Union and stated that “What we want and seek to obtain is a co-operative journey that will end in a co-operative university”. Writing at a time when there were only 15 universities in the UK, Rae saw the development of a co-operative university as another example of members providing for themselves where the State did not: “So long as the State does not provide it, we must do, as we have in the past, the best we can to provide it ourselves.””